I believe Uranus and H-bomb secrecy are the reasons this theory hasn't been proven by some college, university, or government research group by now. Uranus is perplexing. I Uranus is an old planet and it's axis has not been altered by a astronomical hit, then the odds are this theory is not correct. However, Uranus does not propose an absolute failure to my electromagnetic force theory regarding the planets. Kepler's and Newton's laws alone do not explain what is happening with the solar system. Einstein, Kelvin, Gauss, and Maxwell knew something must be acting on the planets other than just gravity. It has been proven, Kepler's and Newton's laws affect the orbits of all satellites, including those of planets, moons, and artificial bodies. However, Kepler's and Newton's laws act within two significant figures when operating on the planets. When acting on the Sun, Sun motion is into much more significant figures before any corollary deflections caused by the planets becomes evident.
LAWS
An attempt will be made to explain how an energy source is propagated in space which accounts for the forces required to drive the solar system. It is important that all known physical laws hold true for any energy source and resultant propagated energy wave.
Physical laws of nature are very different than society's laws. Society's laws are interpreted. Society's laws do not always hold true. Society's laws are enforced by humans in power and are subject to the interpretation of the person in power. Physical laws are not subject to interpretation. Given a normal daily environment; take an object, hold it off the ground and drop the object. The object will fall to the ground every time you do this. This object will fall according to Newton's gravitational laws, every time all the time. You can have the presidents of all the countries in the world, command the object not to fall, but the object will fall each and every time. Physical laws are absolute. When laws of a society are compared to physical laws, society's laws are really suggestions.
For this theory to violate any known physical law would negate the theory. Every physical law must be followed. Then like society's laws, Uranus has to be a joke, or more creativity is needed.
It was shown earlier, that a charge in motion, (ie, an electron current) with respect to a viewer, has a magnetic field about it. Now, let's ask this question; is the magnetic field about a charge, a result of the viewer moving with respect to the charge, or the result of the charge moving with respect to the viewer? The answer can be found by injecting a second viewer. The answer, with a little imagination, is that the charge must be moving for a magnetic field about it to exist.
Here is a test. Take two hollow spheres or cylinders of different conductive characteristics. Charge the spheres and spin them in a magnetically neutral environment. Measure the magnetic field about the spheres or cylinders. One should find that so long as the charge stays on the sphere, the conducting sphere has less of a magnetic field than a nonconducting sphere. The reason for this is that the conducting sphere allows the electrons to respond to the counter forces of inductance, such that the electrons slip counter to the direction of spin. In a nonconducting sphere, the electrons go where they are pushed. Since the charges a moving, a magnetic field is set up.
Now, lets suggest another test. What happens when the charged sphere moves by a sensitive magnetometer? Does a pulse in the magnetometer occur? What happens when the charged sphere moves by the magnetometer a whole lot faster? Does a bigger pulse seem to occur? What happens when the charged sphere and magnetometer move side by side in the same direction?
From the above tests, it can be said that a magnetic field is a reactance force to real charge in motion, and it is independent from the viewer. Then there are times when the magnetic field is moving or changing intensity with respect to a fixed body. At this time, it can be said, the resulting electric field is a reactance force to a magnetic flux in motion, and it too, is independent from the viewer. The proof of a charge in motion yielding a resultant magnetic flux about it is in the proof of a moving charge in an uniform magnetic field. Force equals velocity of Vq * q cross Magnetic * q. Particle beam deflection by TV picture cathode ray tubes demonstrates the force as a function of velocity on a charged particle in a magnetic field.
This test simply states that a magnetic field about a moving charge is a result of another force and itself is not a prim force.
The question is about how the vectors react; are they real cross vectors or are they reactance cross vectors? In the development of all the magnetic formulas there is one common requirement. The requirement is a charge in motion. This suggests Einstein's relationship being; "moving relative to what?" A charged body not moving, will not have a magnetic field to an observer, but will have a magnetic field effect on a magnetic flux moving by the stationary charge. This is the same as a neutral wire having a charged induced at it's ends by a continuously passing uniform magnetic field. The true requirement is not that the charge is in motion, but that there is relative motion between the charge and influencing magnetic field. The vectored forces are that of the charge on the electron and the motion of the magnetic field. These two vectored forces are crossed within the charged media, causing the media to have a force induced in it. The electron being lite compared to a proton, moves easily in one direction, while the proton stays put because it is very massive, thus, a charge is created at the ends of a wire. In this scenario, a neutral stationary wire has a reactance charge induced at it's ends.
The electron in a current carrying conductor is both a charged body and moving. In this system, the electric vector is moving. The results of the moving electric vector is a magnetic field about the vector. This shows up as a magnetic field circling the wire. If the magnetic field is independent of the system which is being evaluated, then to the system, it is immaterial if the magnetic force is a real or reactance force. In a stationary magnetic field, a force is induced in the wire. In the system where the electric field vector is moving along within a length of wire, the magnetic field induced is real to the moving charge. The force is a reactance to the induced magnetic field in the wire. This is the exact opposite of a moving magnetic flux inducing a charge in a wire.
A magnetic flux is the integration of all the magnetic flux in a volume. An uneven magnetic flux forms a flux vector which has a direction and intensity. In any given place or at any given point, the magnetic pressure is a tensor which may have a value even though the flux vector is zero. As an example of magnetic pressure but no vector, would be of the magnetic field flux exactly in the plane between to bar magnetics of same poles pointing at each other. To either side of the center, between the magnetics, there is a magnetic flux vector, but exactly in between, both flux vectors cancel, however, there is a magnetic pressure at that point caused by both the magnets. The pressure is the same as pushing two fingers opposite each other with equal force.
The order of nature is zero. Zero charge, zero magnetic force, zero gravitational force, zero pressure gradient, and zero temperature difference. The order of vectored force reactance is to only react with another vectored force to form a third force. A vectored reactance force only occurs to two vectored forced. Since the plane exactly in the middle of the two bar magnetics has a zero magnetic vector, the affect on a moving charge exactly between these magnets is zero. Now, imagine taking one bar magnet arranged as if a sphere was made out of it such that it is small and north is on the outside. Now, imagine taking the other bar magnet, arranging it such that a sphere which completely covered the smaller sphere were made and the inside was north. Neglecting gravity, the affect of such a device would be to float the inside sphere in the middle of the outer sphere. All the magnetic forces would be forcing this thing to center. Another affect would be that of a spherical zero magnetic vector area somewhere between the two objects.
With iron, this wouldn't be too much trouble to produce. Heat up small spherical segments and allow them to cool properly polarized within a strong magnetic field. The smaller the segment the better the affect. Glue all the segments together starting with the inside sphere. The resulting device would float the inside sphere if sufficient magnetization were used to overcome gravity or the device were in a space station orbiting the Earth.
Unfortunately, one wouldn't be able to see the inside sphere because of the outside sphere being iron. This is why I used the term "imagine." However, if NASA allowed me to spend money to launch this device, they might as well fund one made of lite see through magnetized impregnated plastic. Then there is the question, what's the point? The device would do nothing but demonstrate that a floating object could be created.
Back to the stationary charge. It can be said, that a stationary charge has a quiescent magnetic tensor field associated with it and a zero magnetic force vector. This is to say, that some sort of magnetic field about the stationary charge exists, it's just that the field is inactive, and not doing any thing. Any magnetic field moving in any direction with respect to the stationary charge, would yield an uneven cross vector between the moving magnetic field, and quiescent magnetic field of the stationary charge by the direction of motion.
We know with a state change of an atom's electron, light can be created. LASERs work on this principle. Lightning works on this principle. Florescent light bulbs work on this principle. Light photons generally expand spherically in nature. The LASER effect is to induce a photon emission as a photon goes by an atom in a particular direction. It works. Photons can be emitted by an atom's electron state change in tune with a passing photon. However, a light photon is an alternating emission. The term alternating means, that as the electromagnetic photon or wave is emanating, expanding outward, it's electromagnetic components are changing polarity as the wave passes any given point in space. It's also, a direct result of real vectors acting on each other.
In an atom, as the atoms electron changes state, it generates this photon, which is seen. The electron vector is vibrating about the proton pointing outward at any given time. The stress of electron excitement is absorbing, and the release of the stress is emitting. It requires both the tangential motion of the electron and the spin of the electron to be resonant for steps of excitement. To an observer, the electron always looks as though it circles the proton, in fact, it is an observation and not necessarily fact. The electron wave's perpendicular vector electromagnetically, will appear differently in time by the frequency of stress release. This particular type of electro-tonic stress release has a changing electric and magnetic vector, detectable in space.
The electron is said to be circling the proton. Excited, resting, or changing; the electron vector's translational vector will be in front of the proton fifty percent of the time and in back of the proton the other fifty percent of the time. In a spherically moving environment, there will seem to be an alternating electric field in an emission, because the electron-proton electric intensity will be directly proportional to the instantaneous placement of the electron-proton combination at that instant. The instantaneous electric vector is pointing at the observer and away from the observer in the sin-cos time relationship.
What ever the wave driving the planetary system, must be in a uniform steady state, because the planetary system is in a uniform steady state. An alternating wave will not work. The forces must be constantly in one direction because in an alternating direction they would cancel out. In a word, work has to be done.
Hydrogen Bomb experiments show a traveling electric field which has a traveling magnetic field. This wave travels outward spherically and is measured by it's impact. This wave has a voltage potential which increases in intensity in one direction and decreases to zero. Along with voltage a magnetic component is present. The magnetic wave rises and falls with the electric field wave. Having both the electric field and magnetic field moving is the potential to do work. Not accounting for losses by atmospheric and thermal losses, just this wave, and assuming spherical, then the energy is the work of the electric field plus the work of the magnetic field times the area of the sphere's surface. This particular event was a fission triggered high atmospheric test. Unfortunately, it is hard to determine how much hydrogen actually fussed. If the Sun energy source is the same fusion concept as a hydrogen bomb and releases the same type of electromotive pulse for each fusion reaction, then the sum of the electromotive pulses from the Sun would average into one big long intensive continuous wave.
It seems, as two hydrogen protons collide, the energy is released in some form of electromagnet action. As both hydrogen protons are of the same polarity they should repel each other no matter how close they got. It turns out, once the protons get to a distances closer than the so called bonding force area, the protons unite. The net result of uniting is to lower the mass of both protons. The mass seems to be converted to energy. The energy release is just a super electromagnetic pulse, which has a spherical electric field vector pointing away from the center of collision.
A spherical vector is the concept of supersymetery. Simply, its a single vector with an infinite amount of vectors spherically beside the one under examination. Each vector having the same origin and magnitude but different angle. May be it's not so simple but it's the concept any way. In this Newtonian E = mass times a quantity presumed to be the speed of light squared, the work vector at a distance must either point out, or in, from the center of the sphere. When the work vector points inward, Newton's gravitational mass vector rules. When the work vector points outward, E = MC^2 vector rules.
There are two electromagnetic propagation patterns which would satisfy the electromagnetic equations for this type of event. Since these are my propagation patterns, I get to name them what ever I want. I have named them Classical Electromagnetic Field Vector and Ray Electromagnetic Field Vector. One of the propagation patterns works very well and the other fails miserably for the solar system source of energy. I include the failing pattern because it is important to realize the difference, it has some merit for the light emitting photon, and this the theory in many physics books.
The theory behind the Direct Electromagnetic Field Vectors is, that at creation, the instantaneous magnetic vector is perpendicular to the electric field vector. The concept is of an infinite amount of spherical electric field vectors and spherical magnetic field vectors, in spherical symmetry. In the classical radiation theory, this is how a traveling magnetic field vector is associated with the electric field vector. If one integrates all the components in both degrees of freedom within a spherical environment, the magnetic vector will equal zero at the origin.
However, the theory fails at a distance from creation. At a distance, both the electric field vectors and magnetic field vectors are present. They both have a wave front traveling outward. If this were the case, the magnetic field would be easily measured in space. But, measurements show a singularly polarized magnetic field present directed outward or inward from the Sun. However, the energy in the Sun's field, isn't enough to account for E=MC^2. The saucer affect measured in solar space isn't a singularly polarized magnetic flux either. Another condition which would tend to demonstrate the failure of a direct electromagnetic wave to support the planetary system is how to account for the return magnetic flux.
Not only does the Direct Electromagnetic Field Vectors fail for the Sun-Earth condition but it also fails for some of the classical explanations of the electromagnetic radiation theory. The problem with this field vector theory is the origin. In order for the electric wire to radiate a magnetic field like it does, this theory's origin must change. The worst part of this theory, if the E vector's origin changed, it would need to change perpendicular to current flow.
At the beginning of this chapter I asked you to do some imagining, now, let's start seriously imagining. A current is nothing more than a lot of charges which seem like they are all going in the same direction. Now, imagine the affect of a single charge moving in the same direction.
We can apply the current magnetic field relationships to the charge element by way of the mean free path in a conducting wire of copper. If the mean free path of a substance is shorter it would simply require a larger area to conduct the same amount of charges to attain the same current. One ampere is one ampere, no matter what the material the charges conducts in.
Applying the Biot-Savart law to this current, we can say that the differential length is the same thing as a number of charges moving in the direction of the length. This, in effect, is an electric field force vector in the direction of movement, with regards to a single charge. Relative to any point at a distance from the charge motion electric field vector, the effect is a change in field intensity. Thus, the change in charge due to motion of the charge, will affect the magnetic field, caused by the charge, at the point distant from charge motion. In a conductor, this is a motional electric field vector in the direction of the current, with a magnitude proportional to number of charges moving. Maxwell's equations, Ampere's Circuital law, and Gausses law nothing changes. To the magnetic equations, it makes no difference to the result, if the driving elements are a current made up of a large amount of small charges, a single large charge moving, or a stationary charge increasing in intensity. All three look like a motional electric field vector pointing in some direction.
It should be noted that a motional electric field vector is different from a stationary electric field vector because one is moving and the other is static.
When dealing with a magnetic equation the standard development has been the affect of the field by current. However, a current is nothing more than a group of individual charges moving in a predefined direction constricted by the conductor. Mathematically, it is far easier to sum the charges and calculated the magnetic affect, than calculate each little charge's contribution to the magnetic field at a particular point, and sum the field affects. Newton's calculus is the summation of all the little affects.
To a viewer, the current of one charge flowing in a differential length will have the same affect on a magnetic field at a given point as 1/n times the affect, of n charges, flowing in the same differential length. To a viewer, the charge intensity is going to change at the rate inversely proportional to the square of the change of distance. The distance is going to change proportional to the 1/sin of the angle between the viewer and the direction vector of the charge at two points depending upon velocity. The relationship will hold true no matter what the charge intensity is, the direction the charge is moving, or how fast it is going. The problem with developing a mathematical system is that this becomes very cumbersome for all view points.
To simplify things we'll state that the viewer is in line with the charge motion vector. That is, the moving charge vector is pointing at the viewer. We can say that the charge intensity changes by the inverse of the square of the distance and the distance rate changes directly with velocity. To the rest of the world, has any thing changed? No. A nice thing about a differential length is it's generally straight. In a straight conductor in line with the viewer, we can make another statement which won't change any thing. The magnetic field is the result of all the charges moving in the conductor at migratory speeds. Or, the magnetic field is the result of the electrostatic field divided by the conductors resistance; current equals the electric potential divided by resistance in a conductor or Ohm's law. If the charged mass is moving toward the observer, the charge vector is moving toward the viewer for any given mass.
The speed of electron migration is much slower than the speed of a current. Generally, the speed of a current is almost that of the speed of light. An electric current is the summation of all the electric charges moving at any given time. A magnetic field is produced by moving charges and not a current perse.
We can play some more numbers magic and say, if the affect of vector A on vector C is vector D and the affect of vector B on vector C is vector D then vectors A and B relate with respect of vector C. A motional electric field vector is much the same thing as a current vector moving in the same direction. A charge moving toward the observer exhibits a d
/dt property with respect to the observer. Any condition where the same d/dt property exists in the direction of the observer, will have the same affect as the charge moving toward the observer.
Back to the H-bomb blast and fusion of two hydrogen atoms. The affect of an electric discharge on space is to disperse outward at the media propagation rate in a spherical manner. The discharge will travel through space for as long as it takes to be absorbed and it's intensity will diminish inversely proportional to the square of the distance form the point source, to the location of the wave front, at any given time.
The magnetic affects seen by an observer at any distance from the discharge, will be exactly the same as a charge of the same intensity moving toward the observer. The difference being that the charge is limited in size and intensity, whereas the moving electric field is not. The off angle vectors would have the same affect as a charge moving in the same off angle to the observer. Over the entire sphere each point can related to a motional electric field vector. The magnetic effect by the electric field vector would be the same as a charge moving in that direction.
The Ray Vector Theory supports the condition of a moving origin in E's direction. The concept of moving generally supports the instantaneous change of the origin. As an example; as a mass moves, it has a new instant of origin, from one instant time to another. The limits of integration of this theory operate at a distance from the origin. The Ray Vector Theory works for currents in a wire, radio wave transmission, and a d/dt Gaussian surface as well as the solar system.
One may notice that the magnetic field vectors cancel and only a magnetic pressure is present, not a magnetic vector. This makes it very easy to radiate. Another nicety, is the way the work vector operates. With a spherical work vector pointing outward, the magnetic vector supporting the charge vector must point outward too. With the Ray Theory, the magnetic vector operates exactly like inertia's rotating vector. Simply, it points in the direction of the increase in charge which is outward.
Not only will this concept work for the emission of a pulsed electric field for two fusing protons but it will work for a light photon. This is the only electromagnetic field operating vector structure which will hold true for Huygen's wavelet principle at a distance from the source. This concept of how a motional electromagnetic field will hold up to Snell, Biot-Savart, Maxwell, Ampere, and any one else's laws one would like to throw at it.
The difference between the electron state change emitting a light photon and the proton-proton emission is that the proton-proton primary emission work vector is a pulse. An oscillating electric field vector as a light photon, emission work vector is a electron-proton source rather than proton-proton. A light emitting electron dropping state is the same thing as a lightning bolt. It is a linear action and occasionally spherical but it is a plasmatic electromagnetic change in charge operating state. A light emitting photon is not about twenty-one million electron volts but generally, it is the same thing within a linear instant environment.
Nothing will happen to effect of this wave if at a distance, the electric field changes direction or intensity. Furthermore, this wave will bend, it will reflect, it has transmission characteristics, it can be modulated, it can be polarized, in can be summed, it'll detract, and it can be absorbed. As this wave radiates outward, the electric vector will impact the what ever boundary it hits. Like a window pane, the magnetic pressure would have a two dimensional impact function.
The magnetic component is present as a tenser, and can be affected by any media the wave impacts. If the wave impacted a media with an uneven susceptibility, the wave would be polarized. For example; intensity characteristics are shown to the right as the impulse from the source moves through a body with x direction susceptibility twice as great as the y direction susceptibility. The wave characteristics at the far side of the impact would be significantly different.
Associated with any motional vector or wave is an impact vector. The impact vector will be pointing outward. All the moving electric vectors would have an affect on the impact body. To this wave at impact, it's the over all field which will affect the mass. The perpendicular vector components would cancel and the remaining impact vector would sum only to have an outward direction in line with the source. Every electric ray vector within 180 degrees above, below and to either side would affect the body.
To a body under impact from such a wave, and within a preexisting magnetic field vector, both the proton and electron would have a force on it, in the same direction perpendicular to the impact component,and the existing magnetic field. Generally speaking, this wave looks just like a current through a conductor. The instantaneous electric force on the proton and the electron, is opposite attempting to move the electron in one direction and the proton in the other. Since the direction is opposite and charge is opposite, the resultant vector directions are the same for both charges. The same thing happens to a current in a wire within a magnetic field.
How does existing H-bomb data relate to voltage, magnetic flux, in a time rate for the sun?
At peak:
The voltage impact is 10 ^4 volts / meter.
The magnetic impact is .01 webers per meter squared.
Time rate of 10 ^-7 seconds to peak.
The distance was 300 miles.
The Sun burns 10 ^19 times the material at any given moment than a 100 megaton H-bomb.
We can postulate a one square meter point source at a distance of 300 miles using the square law, then multiply it times the material difference and take the inverse square law relationship to find the value at Earth. These are only approximations: Distance to source in meters: = 300 * 621.4 = 186,420 m. Voltage at source: = 10 ^4 * 186,420 ^2 = 3.48 x 10 ^14 volts / meter. Note: If a straight relationship existed between material burned an output then it would be simply 10 ^19 ^ time the H-bomb source. This isn't the case. This is a total energy relationship. A linear relationship will increase the voltage and an area relationship the magnetic flux. I'll choose 10 ^6 times the voltage, and 10 ^13 for magnetics. 3.16 x 10 ^6 for voltage and 3.16 x 10 ^12 for magnetic is close. As little as 10 percent of the energy would make it to the surface of the Sun. Voltage at Sun: = 3.48 x 10 ^14 * 10 ^6 * .1 = 3.48 x 10 ^19 v/m. Magnetic flux at source: .01 * 186,420 ^2 = 3.48 x 10 ^8 webers/meter ^2. Magnetic flux at Sun: = 3.48 x 10 ^4 * 10 ^ ^13 * .1 = 3.48 x 10 ^20 w/m ^2. Voltage at Earth from Sun: = 3.48 x 10 ^29 / 152,000,000,000 ^2 = 1.5 x 10 ^-2 v/m. Magnetic flux at Earth from Sun: = 1.5 x 10 ^-1 w/m ^2.
Taking volts/meter times webers/square meter yields volt-webers/cubic meter. Since the magnetic relationship of a weber is in terms of tesla which is in terms of current or 1 ampere / square meter, it can be said that a volt weber is the same as a watt. It gives a reasonable approximation for power reaching the Earth.
Power: = 1.5 x 10 ^-2 * 1.5 x 10 ^-1 = 2 x 10 ^ ^-3 w / 10 ^-7 s = 2 x 10 ^4 w/s or joules.
Power/day: = 86,000 s/day * 2 x 10 ^4 w/s = 2 x 10 ^9 w/d.
Volume of Earth: = 
* (12 x 10 ^6 ) ^3 / 6 = 1 x 10 ^21 meters ^3.
Energy the Earth is immersed in: 2 x 10 ^30 j/d.
The type of energy this represents if it were 100% coupled into the Earth we could easily say; if the Sun sneezed the Earth would blow apart. The maximum energy required to power the Earth for it's present conditions is 2.7 x 10 ^20 joules per day. Even at 99.999% losses there would be too much power. Therefore, it would be safe to say that the 10 ^19 difference in burning material between puny H-bomb and the big blast of the Sun isn't a direct relationship. ^However, the answer to the question of sufficient power to be hypothetically possible is "yes." One thing I must admit, my information on a typical H-bomb blast or any other hydrogen-hydrogen reaction is very limited. The United States government from the president on down didn't help me to obtain one simple value about a hydrogen-hydrogen reaction.
To show the ray theory to work under standard principles, take a length of wire, and apply the theory. What is happening to the electric vector pointed perpendicular to the length of wire? Nothing. The perpendicular electric vector with a current flowing in the length of wire is not changing. The differential is zero. A zero differential and a zero change in electric intensity, the perpendicular change in electric flux ray's magnetic vectors aren't present to cancel any affects of the parallel moving electric vectors. The net result is the same thing which seems to exist in a current carrying wire, which is a magnetic flux about the wire.
This chapter tries to explain three occurrences:
1. The force on a stationary electric charged body and a moving magnetic vector; and the force on a moving electric vector and stationary magnetic field. In effect, the force is one an the same on both systems. The force is proportional to the cross products of the vectors, the charge intensity, the magnetic intensity, and the velocity relative to each other. The generated force is independent of an observer.
2. That a proton-proton reaction would create a moving electric field vector of a singular polarity. That the electric field vector would be moving outward spherically form the reaction area. The intensity of electric field vector would be proportional to the summation amount of reactions at any given instant and continue in a constant moving fashion as long as the reactions continue.
4. The phenomenon of an electromagnetic photon verses mass. Mass itself, when moving has 1/2 m*v^2. However, mass moving is all the mass moving in one direction, therefore one would think that the mass kinetic would equal energy released? But, in a photon, mass is moving in two directions: +V and -V at the same time. Thus, the total impact energy at point P, is that which impacts P and that energy which is driving the mass going in the opposite direction or -V. Such mathematical events in electronics is common place and is stated in imaginary numbers. In effect, -V is stabilizing the origin and adding to the impact at P. Therefore, E photon mass= 2Ke mass moving in a single direction.
Einstein suggested mass was energy and energy was mass. If applied using the ray vector photon theory verses the Classical ninety degree to motion theory of a photon, there is no conversion necessary. Energy is just traveling in two directions. When energy is traveling inward such that it's net energy work potential vector is pointing inward, the energy is trapped in a spherical resonance like the magnetic ball. A proton in this segment of the universe's electromagnet pressure environment has a quantized size based upon the number of positive charge units elements flux fields in close proximity. Any thing greater than the limit of quantized size, and the mass is accelerated toward the limits of space in the form of a photon. If it is considered that a proton is the nucleus of an atom with a positive charge, and it is a converson of mass to energy of the proton, then, what charge would one think it is, that the flux fragment of mass comimg at them, had?
Photons come from many sources. Photons can come form a change of state of an electron. Photons can come from a change of state of an atom's nucleus. Photons can come from the vibration of molecules within a chemical reaction. Photons can come from an oscillating electric current flow. Fundamentally, a photon is any electromagnetic wave traveling in space.
Thus, mass itself, is a photon only the work vector is pointing inward. If such is true, an electron and neutron are probably also a photon flux elements. The difference being in the direction of the static charge vectors and potential magnetic work vectors. This would suggest that the electron oozes around the nucleus rather than flies around it. Further suggesting, that, the proton oozes too. Bohr's atom's electron position would suggest resonance in 2, 8, & so on. It also suggests that if protons break up, the mass energy resonant point will collapse to some smaller spherically resonant quantized size. Quarks seem to support this.
The revelation is that in a photon of this spherical ray nature, the motion of the work vector, the charge vector, and the magnetic vector all travel in the same outwardly direction. This yields an infinite number of identical vectors going in a different direction. Being spherical in a unitary direction, evenly integrates and differentiates. Newton would be happy. This supports Einstein's mass-energy relationship, he would be happy. Except for what was said about Maxwell and his magnetic lines, he'd be happy.
TABLE OF CONTENTS