by John Gard
This is about the universe. It started out as an explanation for the Earth's magnetism. However, to explain the theory, a relationship for mass and photon's developed. Then it came to be about the universe.
You will learn things about the universe you didn't know. Should you have a Doctorate at Astrophysics, you will still learn something about the universe you didn't know.
You will learn a theory about what causes the Earth super structure operations. Magnetism, spin, and trajectory, are explained.
It is going on a decade from the time of first copyright and two decades from when I started working on the book. This book has been sold on the internet but now, it has become time to put it on the internet for everyone to learn from it.
I call this Newtonian Astrophysical Universe, Integrated because Newton was hot on Calculous long before the apple hit him in the head. Gravity was not discovered by Newton, it was explained by him. One of Newton's crafts was teaching Calculous. Newton applied his craft to gravity and discovered a physical relationship.
If it didn't integrate, Newton would not approve. Electro-tonic charge vectors and magnetic vectors as presently theorized in many renown physics books do not spherically integrate. Both the charge vector and the magnetic vector are not properly defined in the "Classical Theory of Radiation."
What is the glaring difference between Newton's Gravity and Faraday's, Gauss's, Maxwell's, Coulomb's, and Einstein's photon? It's real simple. It's night verses day, left verses right, and or, here verses there.
The latest update was making a Black Hole fit into the theory. "Laws of time and space break down in a Black Hole." Bull pucky. This theory will account for Black Hole action.
As for the Internet browsers, they must have been written by some very unscientific people. Literacy is an indication of the training. Most Internet browsers can't do scientific notation. Math is the language of science. Internet browsers can't do math output which is why I had to picture frame the equations. All good word processing programs have superscript and subscript. Word Perfect can print some very common math symbols in text such as PI, besides superscripts, subscripts, and equations easy enough. Why can't the Internet browsers? Because the programmers who wrote the Internet browsers didn't have a scientific education. They never learned the scientific language. Probably did not know how to use Word Perfect either. Because, if they had learned scientific language, they would never have allowed such poor performance tool in an educational environment like the Internet.
The problem is further exasperated by childish competition. Not till I made this book available on the Internet and wanted to reach as many as I could, did I realize that Netscape and MicroSoft were deliberately written to be different. It is the type of thing where when one works the other doesn't. Too bad!
So, excuse me, for having primitive notation. ^ is superscript. Subscript uses a relative font size smaller than the main font. There were problems with images. What really was an unsurmountable problem, is the dipole operation of some of the browsers. Browsers were written in an obvious polarized manner. What works on say "A" browser, does not work on "B" such that if it where to work on "B", it would not work on "A." Both images and table alignment operated this way. And, this doesn't begin to explain the problem when one takes into consideration Frames and Java. For the masses, this was written to work on Windows 95, MicroSoft Internet Explorer.
There is going to be a big question asked. That is, why weren't the end numbers used to calculate the exact force-energy relationship? The answer is a little difficult to explain outright.
One magnitude intensity set of time vector numbers is needed to be complete. The numbers are the electro magnetic outcome of a single proton proton fusion. This outcome is associated with the hydrogen bomb, and is somewhat guarded. No one will admit to knowing it. Now, I ask you as tax payers, those people running colliders, super colliders, what are they doing? My problem is from time to time I work for the government as an indirect consultant and I don't want to print anything which would jeopardize my cash flow.
I've sent three presidents a copy of my book and asking for the number. The only one who answered me was the one who wanted to be known as "The President for Science." Mr. Science President didn't know. So, someone in his office said! Actually, it's a need to know number and the government doesn't think I have a need to know. And, Mr. Science President probably didn't need to know either.
After reading this material, you will find the number can easily be extrapolated. But, the bottom line is, if I get to officially know it, the government knows I'll print it in a heart beat. So it has been determined, you don't need to know it either.
On the other hand, if the powers to be really don't know it, then this writing will give them something to look forward too. May be even employ someone. Because it is a number which needs to be found.
Another little tad bit of knowledge I gained toying with the government over this number. Why hasn't the government come up with a hydrogen-hydrogen reaction to supply power? It's difficult, you say? No, no, no, it's what would happen if the way were simple? In the course of hard to easy, how long does it take to go from hard building to easy building, once known?
Think about it. If you could drive your car on heavy water, you must have access to the water. So everyone would have access to the material. If the reaction can be controlled to operate an automobile, how much more difficult would it be to make a really big bang? If everyone has access to the material, plans were published on the Internet for the big bang, and it were easy to build, how safe would it be on this planet?
For proper viewing, use 1280 by 1024 resolution. However, a lower resolution format will be developed sooon.(sic) The original pictures and print format are being used first. The only way I could afford to print up this book was in black and white. Better pictures will come too, and whole lot of editing for HTML story telling. Editing will be on going for a while. If the jumps don't work, well, for a while, that's the way it is.
The following Table of Contents is in the order of original compilation. It is arranged in this order because the development needs math support. Sometime in the future, it will change because the Internet HyperText Markup Language will allow more interactive commands than a book. Also, I not a good writer. I'm good with numbers and computers but poor at writing. I didn't learn to write until I got my own word processor. A secretary use to to it for me. Now, I a published writer, and if it weren't for my computer, you'd really laugh yourself sick. Additionally, I capitalize the names of the solar bodies. Yes, I know it is not grammatically correct. So what? It is my book and I want to emphasize Earth, Sun, and the such. Tough!
TABLE OF CONTENTS